GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.6 Plus vs GLM-5.1

  1. Qwen3.6 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.6 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder45/10080/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GLM-5.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark87/10034/10042/1000/10045/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.50/ 1M
$1.40/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$4.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.05/ 1M
$0.26/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
66K
85K
Completed sessions
108,690
94,317
Token share
0.01%
0.02%
Tokens
120B-62%
156B-71%
AUG 10OCT 4
AUG 10OCT 4
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
54.3%2.8K user-weeks
53.8%3.4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.