Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 4.5
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 100/100 | 84/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 100/100 | 30/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1M
67K
Completed sessions
342,263,864
68,303
Token share
17.1%
0%
Tokens
158T+100%
35B-60%
AUG 10OCT 4
AUG 10OCT 4
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.5%24K user-weeks
40.4%2.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.5·Jamba Large